Sunday, October 26, 2008


Barak Obama has censored an Orlando television station for asking questions the current mainstream media have refused to ask, even though they are valid probing questions that should be answered given his stands on forced wealth transfer.

Will other media come to the defense of a colleague who is being censored, even if they are in the tank for Obama. Don't count on it. You are only allowed to censor conservative voices, or voices asking the honest questions Obama should answer.

From Orlando

Biden so disliked West's line of questioning that the Obama campaign canceled a WFTV interview with Jill Biden, the candidate's wife.

"This cancellation is non-negotiable, and further opportunities for your station to interview with this campaign are unlikely, at best for the duration of the remaining days until the election," wrote Laura K. McGinnis, Central Florida communications director for the Obama campaign.

McGinnis said the Biden cancellation was "a result of her husband's experience yesterday during the satellite interview with Barbara West."

Here's a link to the interview:


NewsGnome said...

Lonely, I do not publish a comments authored by someone else and allegedly signed by me. I consider that dishonest. So, your comment will not be published.

You said you would provide the problems with Obama's tax plan but failed to do so. You have a one track mind..."I am smart and must tell everybody" since everybody needs to know it how smart I am. Hogwash! Yes you are intelligent but your lack of real life experience is blaringly obvious.

You have repeatedly said that everybody tells you you're brilliant, which you perpetually recite. It has become a tedious mantra.

You equate intellect with the acquisition of knowledge. It is a fallacious conclusion. MENSA and other intelligence ratings organizations have hosts of members who have high IQs in some areas but are average in others. Einstein could hardly add two and two but posited some the most sophisticated physics theories in existence.

Please answer one question for me, You perpetually claim to be brilliant....brilliant at precisely what?


TheLonelyArtistClub said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

Welcome to the future should Obama win. Just like they investigated Joe The Plumber and used law enforcement in Minnesota to go after anyone speaking out against this elitist.And this is before he has any presidential power?

NewsGnome said...

What's absurd is that you think you have the right to write my comments…that is absurd! I don't supposed to write yours comments.
You also didn't answer the question: "Brilliant at what?" If it's logic, I'm seeing some pretty big flaws.

Your response is nonsensical. Socialism has a definite meaning. The first sentence in the World Socialist Movement is very clear. It is an follows:

"Central to the meaning of socialism is common ownership. This means the resources of the world being owned in common by the entire global population."

In Obama's definition he is the one who gets to tax. His economic plan is immaterial. He has proposed almost 1-trillion dollars worth of spending, and claims that he can cut the budget to fund his expenditures. It is, in your word, absurd. There aren't enough rich to pay for what he wants to spend even if you confiscated every dime they have. His aim is control. Ownership is in common, as defined by the WSM. Thus all you own by definition does not belong to you. And that's alright with you? Apparently so. I am surprised that you want to talk about the specifics of a tax plan that is utterly meaningless in light of the underlying philosophical basis.

You say, "My response would be that the way I think is to respond to specific arguments and not rhetoric." That's all I've ever seen from you…Democrat rhetoric and talking points.

You, of all people, should want to discuss the philosophical under pinning of Obama's desire to "spread the wealth." His own words condemn him. How many examples are there now of him on audio suggesting ways to take earnings of one person and give them to another. It is a simple philosophical concept, utterly abhorrent, but simple.

Common ownership by the "entire global population" is socialism. As for me, I'll take enlightened self-interest every time. I'll give you a little story to illustrate my specific opinion. I was a sculptor for 22 years. Enlightened self-interest has created the greatest outpouring of creativity in the history of man. I sculpted for the very rich…those above $100 million and for the Joe the plumbers. One of the things I learned was that the concept to produce and purchase much sought after products has an extremely beneficial impact on the buyer and seller. The impetus of which could be described as greed. Am I greedy to create a sculpture and expect to be paid and expect to have the right to spend that pay as I see fit?

What has Obama ever created…zero, zilch, nada. I take that back. He has created a thugocracy to threaten, cheat, steal and destroy our constitution through voter fraud…Just read Hillary supporters on that. How did he steal the Iowa caucuses. He brought in loads of out of state people (Acorn) to register fraudulent voters in Iowa in the caucuses and simply out voted her. He was and is finally someone who was even more ruthless and dishonest than the Clintons…and that was her big surprise . He is willing to trash anything to win…including the Constitution.

The socialistic response is that I create a sculpture which immediately becomes the property of the "entire global population." What then becomes my incentive to create? Nothing! It is, in effect, a disincentive to create. You may be willing and anxious to give up your freedom to the likes of the socialistic Mr. Obama. I'm not! You are obviously willing to use your intellect to create a book or story and turn the proceeds over to the government for distribution. I'm not!

America has become so great because we have allowed our citizens to have the opportunity to pursue the dream. Obama wants to take control of our dreams.

Remember the waiter, whose tip was given to the homeless man. That's what will happen in American, and in the process Obama will bankrupt not only our finances, but our souls.

TheLonelyArtistClub said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

'Twas the night before elections and all through the town, tempers were flaring, emotions all up and down! I, in my bathrobe with a cat in my lap. Had cut off the TV tired of political crap. When all of a sudden there arose such a noise, I peered out of my window saw Obama and his boys. They had come for my wallet they wanted my pay, to give to the others who had not worked a day!
He snatched up my money and quick as a wink. Jumped back on his bandwagon as I gagged from the stink. He then rallied his henchmen who were pulling his cart, I could tell they were out to tear my country apart! ' On Fannie, on Freddie, On Biden and Ayers! On Acorn, On Pelosi' He screamed at the pairs!They took off for his cause and as he flew out of sight, I heard him laugh at the nation who wouldn't stand up and fight!
So I leave you to think on this one final note- IF YOU DONT WANT SOCIALISM GET OUT AND VOTE!!!!
Lonely-this is a cut a paste.

NewsGnome said...

L, will respond more fully in a day or two and answer your questions. Speaking of typos, don't you mean Tolstoy? :) NG

NewsGnome said...


I'm feeling a movement in the voters that they are finally seeing Obama as the socialist he is and will socialize our government. He wants to destroy our Constitution, and was saying it years ago.


Anonymous said...

History of Democrat Rule:
Carter had the filabuster proof majority - look what he did! Double digit inflation, interest rates and unemployment.

Johnson had a filabuster proof majority - we got the great society which destroyed black families, took the dad's out of the homes, teenaged girls giving birth way out of proportion to the rest of the country and welfare moms for 3 generations.

Roosevelt had a filabuster proof majority and got the new deal which socialized the country for the first time in history.

Three times, three democrats and now theywant to finish off this country with a fourth.

NewsGnome said...

Yea,sort of the "4th Reich" of national socialism. Can you say der furer Obama?