Sunday, November 21, 2010


What is it that's driving Americans crazy, as illustrated by the TSA's horrendously invasive groping and feel up policies advocated to combat terrorists getting on planes? It's politicians who demand that we pay a personally horrible cost and be subjected to personal degradation that they exempt themselves from.

I suggest that Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton and every member of their families be subject to the exact policies they're demanding be imposed on Americans for at least a year before those policies are applied to us. Obama-Hillary are refusing the feel up groping she imposing on children.

If there is anyone who is giving us probably cause to search him or her it's Obama and Hillary. They are in the process of destroying America, much like terrorists. Sounds like probably cause to me.

I think Obama and Hillary be groped and felt up every time they get on a plane, even when getting on Air Force One. If they're scared that the pilots who are flying the plane will crash it, how can we trust the alleged president and secretary of state?

What are the chances of this happening…zero, nada, zilch. But one can dream.

Thursday, November 18, 2010


OK Americans we have arrived. Either we have to (1) install a system to profile airline passengers, which liberals claim violates the fourth amendment of unreasonable searches and seizures, (2) we accept the same-sex groping of our genitalia which is a violation of our fourth amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures ("Hey, don't touch my Junk!") or (3) have an X-ray showing your naked body which is a violation of the fourth amendment against unreasonable searches and seizures.

In a way it's a decision to use our brains, eyes or hands to maintain our security. Sort of like a pick-your-poison. By using our brains we can profile and assume that 3-year old children may not be terrorist threats. To avoid even the perception of profiling, we seem to be willing to allow the fondling of the most private parts of our children and ourselves by persons whose sexual-orientation or proclivities are not necessarily known or even to have X-rays (that could be considered child pornography) and naked pictures of us taken.

I vote on using our brains rather than our eyes, leave our children, nuns, and grandmothers with their sanity and dignity. It's about time to adopt the Israeli model. Extra training of gropers isn't going to cut it if that male groper is gay and enjoying himself or a lesbian and enjoying herself. All the extra training will do is help them do their groping more efficiently. Of course, this theory is so totally politically incorrect, I'm certain I'll will be accused of homophobia.

Then, there is also the amount of radiation that it absorbed by our bodies if we fly a lot, but that's a medical question and doesn't necessarily conflict with the fourth amendment. It is also too stupid to force pilots to under go profiling for obvious reasons. It's also too stupid to think that the gropers will find a bomb on a pilot since he or she are the ones to have their hands on the stick. Pilots can fly the plane into the ground any time they want.


Wednesday, November 03, 2010


I’ve read many assertions as to what Republicans and the new Tea Party congressmen and women and senators must do to fulfill the promise of a more conservative agenda. For the most part, the solutions involve presenting specific legislative proposals that address a variety of issues.

My assertion is even more fundamental. If Conservatives are to enshrine the principles of the U.S. Constitution, we must do so by challenging the fundamental premises put forth by Liberal Democrats and the Main Stream Media, including the pundits who constantly make assumptions as though only their premises are valid.

The truth is that at least half of those premises are wrong to start with so Conservative must resists the urge to accept the premises offered as inviolate, and redefine the concepts under consideration in light of the Constitution, not the assumed conventional wisdom. Because a liberal pundit makes an assertion in his or her question that something is so, does not make it so.

If a journalist’s question assumes Republicans must compromise with Barack Obama, then the Republican must attack the journalist’s assumption first and reverse the assumption is that it is Obama who must compromise with the newly elected congressional members.

No longer must Republicans simply accept the basis of questions by the MSM. They must go on the attack defending our Constitutional right to incorporate the principles of our founding fathers. Because a proposition is considered “progressive” does not mean it’s Constitutional or even desirable. When the new elected office holders in Washington understand that and do it, then we’ll know we have a chance to save America.