Thursday, May 19, 2016
Muslims vs the World
I ran across this you tube video of Russians vs Muslims. It is extremely
disturbing. It is NOT intended for children. I do not recommend watching
it if you do not have a strong stomach. The problem is that it is
symptomatic of something that appears to be happening all over the
world. Many Muslims, who claim there's is a religion of peace, have not
been peaceful. Extremely few Muslims speak out against the cancer that
is destroying their own religion...radicalism. They're assuming
that there will not be a backlash. BUT! Swedish citizens are burning
down Muslim refugee camps to limit the number of Muslims moving into
that country. Denmark is freezing the number of Muslim refugees it will
take. British citizens have been violently defending British girls who
are attacked by Muslim immigrants for their dress or other alleged
violations of Islam. Angola has banned Islam from their county because
of the hateful violence.German patience is at an end and Merkle is sure
to be voted out because of her decisions on Muslims. Videos of these few
examples are easily found on You Tube. Muslims are offending people
around the world with their hatred-filled attacks demanding that
infidels submit to the will of Allah. The truth is Muslims cannot fight
the whole world no matter what they may think. Attacks on citizens of
counties into which Muslims demand immigration will not long wait for
peaceful acquiescence in their new homelands. And, it's for sure that
the same attacks that have occurred in Europe, Africa, Asia,and
elsewhere will create a massive backlash in America if they occur here.
Islam must begin policing itself if it wants to survive.
Sunday, April 03, 2016
Saturday, April 26, 2014
CLIMATE GUESSERS
More and more
scientists are beginning to leave the sinking ship called "Climate
Change." Recently, two major
scientists have very noisily fallen off the climate change momentum wagon. Professor Woodcock is Emeritus Professor of
Chemical Thermodynamics at the University of Manchester, in an interview with
the Yorkshire Evening Post and reported in Nick Hallett's Breitbart column
April 26, 2014, called the term climate change meaningless since essentially
there has never been a time on earth that the climate has not been
changing.
He concurrently
claimed that "There is no
reproducible scientific evidence CO2 has significantly increased in the last
100 years."
The scientific
method of proving a hypothesis is that you produce a replicable test
verifying the hypothesis which other
scientists can then confirm by reproducing the test with the same results. Scientific computer models have been proven
wrong so often that they're meaningless at this point. Garbage in, garbage out, as they say. None of the computer models that scientists
swear by, have predicted the current state of stasis in the temperature since
1998. Thus there is a serious problem
with the predictive models.
Meanwhile, James
Lovelock, once touted as a "green guru" has rejected the so-called
consensus science promoted by the ICPP and it's most recent report as too
politicized to be of scientific value.
But his claim
"that climate scientists "just guess", and that no one really
knows what's happening," is priceless.
Faulty computer
models, climate scientists non-replicable theories, claims that specific weather events are
directly attributable to anthropomorphic climate change or warming, really put
climate scientists pushing they're propaganda into a succinct couple of
words: Climate Guessers.
Also from Hallett's
column: Judith Curry, chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at
the Georgia Institute of Technology, also said that she was "duped into
supporting the IPCC" and added "If the IPCC is dogma, then count me in
as a heretic."
Tuesday, March 04, 2014
THE DANGER OF VOTING PRESENT
With America's
foreign policy an utter failure it is horribly scary to contemplate that Barack
Obama insouciance is fomenting World War III.
But, with his apotheosis in the minds of his obsequious sycophants, he
will dither until Vladimir Putin with the Chinese, Iranians and other states
try to divide the world once again.
In discussing the
world's precarious and explosive situation with my wife, she made the precise
point of what Obama's doing regarding his foreign policy. She said: "he's voting present." What an absolutely astute truth! He is voting present, just as he frequently
did as an Illinois state senator .
His "failure to
launch" on Syria, despite his "red line" threat, embolden
Iran. They continue to make nuclear
grade uranium, develop missiles and threaten Israel. China saw Obama's weakness and is now closer
to war with Japan [and potentially Taiwan] over territory than at any time
since World War II. Putin heard his
message that he'd have more latitude after the elections and understood that
Obama could be rolled…the taking of Crimea by armed force is just the first
step in what could be a wholesale rebuilding of the Soviet Union. Other eastern European countries know they're
now under threat. Thank you Mr. Obama.
He's refusing to
even address the foreign policy issues that could kill billions. Barack Obama proves once again he is beyond
naive in understanding geopolitical issues.
Mitt Romney told him. Sarah Palin told him and all he did was mock
them. Now the "chickens are coming
home to roost" to quote his favorite so-called "Christian
pastor," and it's because of
Obama's policies, or lack there, that illustrate his voting
present on the world stage and it's cost.
He is allowing the
balkanization of Ukraine. His decision
on American energy restrictions have slowed our development of oil and gas
fields that could have easily forced Russia to be much more circumspect with
regard to their oil pipelines to Europe.
Domestic decisions do have an impact on the world. Geopolitical decisions obviously have an
impact on America and her interests.
Putin fully knows he has a strangle hold on the European oil supply with at least seventeen oil
pipelines going into those countries through Ukraine and that they will be in fear, causing them
to fail to stand up to his thuggish geopolitical behavior. Obama is not only voting present, he is
completely impotent.
Saturday, February 22, 2014
OBAMA THE AMERIPHOPE
What is Barack Hussein Obama? Socialist, Communist, Muslim, Fascist,
Anarchist, bigot, racist or is he really an Ameriphope? Does he really hate America and doing
everything he can to defecate on the Constitution and in particular its Bill of
Rights?
His latest ploy to control news rooms with “monitors” and
the examination of intent of news media is a direct attack on the first
amendment’s freedom of speech and a free press.
As you read the first amendment you realize that Obama is not only
attacking speech and press but in a subtle, but no less ominous, way attacking
religion.
He has used his Obamacare disaster to attack religious
organizations and their religious spiritually held principles essentially
forcing a kind of liberation theological atheism on the whole country. Obviously, what he learned from Jeremiah
Wright’s brand of theology is that America is not the land of the free and not
that Christ is his savior. Then comes
Obama’s effort, using the NSA and license plate monitors, to control whom you
see, where you go and what you may or may not do. That is an obvious attack on our right to
assembly.
And the final right in the first amendment is the right to
petition the government for redress of grievances. Here, Obamacare is at it again. The demolition of our healthcare insurance
programs with millions of American unable to get the insurance they prefer and
no way to challenge Obama’s pell mell
changing of laws inherent in Obamacare.
We have no way to demand redress of our grievances because Obama will
not tolerate criticism of his self-assumed “imperial hand of destiny” and his will
use the Internal Revenue Service for his ends. Why not? Bill and Hillary Clinton used it extensively when they were in the White House.
So in short, Obama has obliterated the first amendment to
the constitution. The very amendment that
liberals quote ad nauseam that became the rallying cry for the hippies and one
of their champions, Mario Savio. How
ironic that the very person who claims to be a constitutional scholar is the
one who is attacking its fundamental tenants.
Perhaps, the reason Obama became a constitutional lawyer was
so he could try to destroy the constitution with an attack from within. It appears that his constitutional studies
were designed to apply Saul Alinsky’s tactics from “Rules for Radicals” to suppress
the very liberties that the ten amendments were and are designed to protect.
Although I have focused on just the first amendment, it is
equally true that he has distorted and diminished, as much as he can, the rest
of the amendments.
This is the standard that Obama has set. He can make laws from his White House desk
without the approval of congress with his pen and telephone. He can change laws passed by congress and
signed by him at his prerogative and discretion. Obama is not a president who has followed the
oath he took before the whole nation. He
is a president that obviously hates America, thus Obama is an Ameriphobe.
The next question is what will happen when Obama is voted
out of office and a Republican or Tea Party candidate assumes the mantel and
they chose to attack the left using the same agencies that Obama used to attack
the right. Obama has set the
pattern.
Liberals are just now beginning to see the potential they
have allowed Obama to wrought. As his
administration appears to be coming to an "end" in 2014 with the very real
possibility of Republicans taking control of Congress,he will begin to see that he will be
a very lame duck indeed, but the aftermath may easily be the collapse of the
Democrat party as we know it today. Democrats are stepping on the Obamacare landmine. It just hasn't gone off yet.
Sunday, December 22, 2013
HE HAS NO HUMOR
Barack Obama has
been a difficult person to evaluate.
I've been unable to really say what it is about him that makes him seem
so unappealing. His policies have been
disastrous to everyone and the constitution.
He's been haled as a magnificent orator. I agree he is a good teleprompter
reader. As for his oration, it is
incredibly repetitious and numbingly
boring.
But even that isn't
his problem. Those who know him say he
is gracious and friendly. To me his
appearance is just the opposite. He
appears aloof and not engaged in reality as though he is above the mundane
elements of life.
So what is his
problem. For me it is that he is totally
humorless. Obama is about as funny as a
vomit sandwich. Reagan used his unending
variety of humorous stories like a razor on his opponents and Americans loved
him for it. Reagan was naturally and
personally engaging with his humor when
he needed to be. He honed his skills with the addition of his infectious smile. When Obama smiles it's as though his apotheosis is at hand so his photograph must make him appear visionary which winds up being the opposite.
But Obama is just
the opposite of Reagan too. He acts as though
everything he says should be chiseled in stone.
Since he has no humor and he doesn't know how to use it to connect with
average Americans his communication skills are negligible. He is not a good orator. He is a humorless dredge.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)