Isn’t it interesting that today’s so-called journalists will disrespectfully slam President Bush with questions and follow-ups to embarrass him as much as possible, but when it comes to the Adolph Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Mau S Kohmanai, Idi Amin, Saddam Hussein, Mahoud Ahmedinejad, these same “hardhitting” journalists lob nurfball questions at them and are never disrespectful to the murderers of millions.
Witness Dan Rather’s questioning of Saddam Hussein and Mike Wallace’s questioning of the Hitler of today, Ahmedinejad. The simple reason is that these “hardhitting” journalists can get away with attacking President Bush. If Wallace had done what he’s done to presidents, to Iran’s Ahmedinejad, he would have never made it back to America.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
In all defense of these left-wing journalists I have to say they just want to make their mark by interviewing questionable subjects. The moment they are not nice to them the interview is over. So they will d anything to get the interview. But they should also not try to embarass their own president because then tha interview should be over as well.
tos
The double standard even in interviewing is very apparent, not counting the type of questions and the tone in which their are asked.
And yes, when the double standard is manifest, the presidential interview should be over. NG
Post a Comment