Thursday, May 19, 2016
I ran across this you tube video of Russians vs Muslims. It is extremely disturbing. It is NOT intended for children. I do not recommend watching it if you do not have a strong stomach. The problem is that it is symptomatic of something that appears to be happening all over the world. Many Muslims, who claim there's is a religion of peace, have not been peaceful. Extremely few Muslims speak out against the cancer that is destroying their own religion...radicalism. They're assuming that there will not be a backlash. BUT! Swedish citizens are burning down Muslim refugee camps to limit the number of Muslims moving into that country. Denmark is freezing the number of Muslim refugees it will take. British citizens have been violently defending British girls who are attacked by Muslim immigrants for their dress or other alleged violations of Islam. Angola has banned Islam from their county because of the hateful violence.German patience is at an end and Merkle is sure to be voted out because of her decisions on Muslims. Videos of these few examples are easily found on You Tube. Muslims are offending people around the world with their hatred-filled attacks demanding that infidels submit to the will of Allah. The truth is Muslims cannot fight the whole world no matter what they may think. Attacks on citizens of counties into which Muslims demand immigration will not long wait for peaceful acquiescence in their new homelands. And, it's for sure that the same attacks that have occurred in Europe, Africa, Asia,and elsewhere will create a massive backlash in America if they occur here. Islam must begin policing itself if it wants to survive.
Sunday, April 03, 2016
Saturday, April 26, 2014
More and more scientists are beginning to leave the sinking ship called "Climate Change." Recently, two major scientists have very noisily fallen off the climate change momentum wagon. Professor Woodcock is Emeritus Professor of Chemical Thermodynamics at the University of Manchester, in an interview with the Yorkshire Evening Post and reported in Nick Hallett's Breitbart column April 26, 2014, called the term climate change meaningless since essentially there has never been a time on earth that the climate has not been changing.
He concurrently claimed that "There is no reproducible scientific evidence CO2 has significantly increased in the last 100 years."
The scientific method of proving a hypothesis is that you produce a replicable test verifying the hypothesis which other scientists can then confirm by reproducing the test with the same results. Scientific computer models have been proven wrong so often that they're meaningless at this point. Garbage in, garbage out, as they say. None of the computer models that scientists swear by, have predicted the current state of stasis in the temperature since 1998. Thus there is a serious problem with the predictive models.
Meanwhile, James Lovelock, once touted as a "green guru" has rejected the so-called consensus science promoted by the ICPP and it's most recent report as too politicized to be of scientific value.
But his claim "that climate scientists "just guess", and that no one really knows what's happening," is priceless.
Faulty computer models, climate scientists non-replicable theories, claims that specific weather events are directly attributable to anthropomorphic climate change or warming, really put climate scientists pushing they're propaganda into a succinct couple of words: Climate Guessers.
Also from Hallett's column: Judith Curry, chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at the Georgia Institute of Technology, also said that she was "duped into supporting the IPCC" and added "If the IPCC is dogma, then count me in as a heretic."
Tuesday, March 04, 2014
With America's foreign policy an utter failure it is horribly scary to contemplate that Barack Obama insouciance is fomenting World War III. But, with his apotheosis in the minds of his obsequious sycophants, he will dither until Vladimir Putin with the Chinese, Iranians and other states try to divide the world once again.
In discussing the world's precarious and explosive situation with my wife, she made the precise point of what Obama's doing regarding his foreign policy. She said: "he's voting present." What an absolutely astute truth! He is voting present, just as he frequently did as an Illinois state senator .
His "failure to launch" on Syria, despite his "red line" threat, embolden Iran. They continue to make nuclear grade uranium, develop missiles and threaten Israel. China saw Obama's weakness and is now closer to war with Japan [and potentially Taiwan] over territory than at any time since World War II. Putin heard his message that he'd have more latitude after the elections and understood that Obama could be rolled…the taking of Crimea by armed force is just the first step in what could be a wholesale rebuilding of the Soviet Union. Other eastern European countries know they're now under threat. Thank you Mr. Obama.
He's refusing to even address the foreign policy issues that could kill billions. Barack Obama proves once again he is beyond naive in understanding geopolitical issues. Mitt Romney told him. Sarah Palin told him and all he did was mock them. Now the "chickens are coming home to roost" to quote his favorite so-called "Christian pastor," and it's because of Obama's policies, or lack there, that illustrate his voting present on the world stage and it's cost.
He is allowing the balkanization of Ukraine. His decision on American energy restrictions have slowed our development of oil and gas fields that could have easily forced Russia to be much more circumspect with regard to their oil pipelines to Europe. Domestic decisions do have an impact on the world. Geopolitical decisions obviously have an impact on America and her interests.
Putin fully knows he has a strangle hold on the European oil supply with at least seventeen oil pipelines going into those countries through Ukraine and that they will be in fear, causing them to fail to stand up to his thuggish geopolitical behavior. Obama is not only voting present, he is completely impotent.
Saturday, February 22, 2014
What is Barack Hussein Obama? Socialist, Communist, Muslim, Fascist, Anarchist, bigot, racist or is he really an Ameriphope? Does he really hate America and doing everything he can to defecate on the Constitution and in particular its Bill of Rights?
His latest ploy to control news rooms with “monitors” and the examination of intent of news media is a direct attack on the first amendment’s freedom of speech and a free press. As you read the first amendment you realize that Obama is not only attacking speech and press but in a subtle, but no less ominous, way attacking religion.
He has used his Obamacare disaster to attack religious organizations and their religious spiritually held principles essentially forcing a kind of liberation theological atheism on the whole country. Obviously, what he learned from Jeremiah Wright’s brand of theology is that America is not the land of the free and not that Christ is his savior. Then comes Obama’s effort, using the NSA and license plate monitors, to control whom you see, where you go and what you may or may not do. That is an obvious attack on our right to assembly.
And the final right in the first amendment is the right to petition the government for redress of grievances. Here, Obamacare is at it again. The demolition of our healthcare insurance programs with millions of American unable to get the insurance they prefer and no way to challenge Obama’s pell mell changing of laws inherent in Obamacare. We have no way to demand redress of our grievances because Obama will not tolerate criticism of his self-assumed “imperial hand of destiny” and his will use the Internal Revenue Service for his ends. Why not? Bill and Hillary Clinton used it extensively when they were in the White House.
So in short, Obama has obliterated the first amendment to the constitution. The very amendment that liberals quote ad nauseam that became the rallying cry for the hippies and one of their champions, Mario Savio. How ironic that the very person who claims to be a constitutional scholar is the one who is attacking its fundamental tenants.
Perhaps, the reason Obama became a constitutional lawyer was so he could try to destroy the constitution with an attack from within. It appears that his constitutional studies were designed to apply Saul Alinsky’s tactics from “Rules for Radicals” to suppress the very liberties that the ten amendments were and are designed to protect.
Although I have focused on just the first amendment, it is equally true that he has distorted and diminished, as much as he can, the rest of the amendments.
This is the standard that Obama has set. He can make laws from his White House desk without the approval of congress with his pen and telephone. He can change laws passed by congress and signed by him at his prerogative and discretion. Obama is not a president who has followed the oath he took before the whole nation. He is a president that obviously hates America, thus Obama is an Ameriphobe.
The next question is what will happen when Obama is voted out of office and a Republican or Tea Party candidate assumes the mantel and they chose to attack the left using the same agencies that Obama used to attack the right. Obama has set the pattern.
Liberals are just now beginning to see the potential they have allowed Obama to wrought. As his administration appears to be coming to an "end" in 2014 with the very real possibility of Republicans taking control of Congress,he will begin to see that he will be a very lame duck indeed, but the aftermath may easily be the collapse of the Democrat party as we know it today. Democrats are stepping on the Obamacare landmine. It just hasn't gone off yet.
Sunday, December 22, 2013
Barack Obama has been a difficult person to evaluate. I've been unable to really say what it is about him that makes him seem so unappealing. His policies have been disastrous to everyone and the constitution. He's been haled as a magnificent orator. I agree he is a good teleprompter reader. As for his oration, it is incredibly repetitious and numbingly boring.
But even that isn't his problem. Those who know him say he is gracious and friendly. To me his appearance is just the opposite. He appears aloof and not engaged in reality as though he is above the mundane elements of life.
So what is his problem. For me it is that he is totally humorless. Obama is about as funny as a vomit sandwich. Reagan used his unending variety of humorous stories like a razor on his opponents and Americans loved him for it. Reagan was naturally and personally engaging with his humor when he needed to be. He honed his skills with the addition of his infectious smile. When Obama smiles it's as though his apotheosis is at hand so his photograph must make him appear visionary which winds up being the opposite.
But Obama is just the opposite of Reagan too. He acts as though everything he says should be chiseled in stone. Since he has no humor and he doesn't know how to use it to connect with average Americans his communication skills are negligible. He is not a good orator. He is a humorless dredge.