To destroy our booming stock market...Vote Democrat!
NG
8 comments:
Anonymous
said...
It scares me to no end NG. I guess the stock market only counts when there's a Bill Clinton in the White House. But now it's all about minimum wage. They want someone who stocks Shelves at Walmart to be able to own a home and support a family of five.If I remember correctly when I worked at MacDonald's when I was 14 I don't recall being able to even support myself. tos
You think Clinton is running? That's rich....LOL!!!
I bet you haven't got the guts to put your money where you mouth is. If the Democrats win, put all your money in the economy. If you are so right, you'll make a mint. Right?
By the way, please stay on point. remember, Clinton isn't running, think Pelosi and Reid.
The table tells the story. Since 1948, Republican Administrations have controlled the White House 57.2 percent of the time. But during the period that the GOP was in office, stock returns have averaged only 9.53 percent per year, while under Democratic administrations, stocks returned 15.25 percent per year, more than five percentage points higher.
You're the one who signed your comment “Putz.” You are absolutely right, you and the Democrats could care less about the stock market. Problem is, 60 per cent of Americans own stocks, so please, keep spouting that attitude. It’s such an intelligent concept...but typical of Democrats.
By the way, keep your foul keyboard on your own blog. Argue all you want, Mr. Putz, but keep your cussing to yourself. Your obvious hate is reminiscent of Moveon.org Democrats. But you're still unwilling to put your money where your mouth is.
You friend Jeremy Siegel called Clinton’s economy one of the “...greatest bubbles in history” and you know what fills bubbles. It was the largest single value loss in the history of the stock market other than the Depression. That was the real Clinton economy.
But despite what your claim, Clinton’s biggest challenge were thong panties. He had it easy because he did nothing about six terrorist attacks on America and turned over a recession and terrorists mess to Bush. Republicans have always had to clean up messes left by Democrats.
Anon obviously doesn't know who was responsible for the economy under Clinton. Let's give a hint. It wasn't a democrat congress and it wasn't Bill Clinton making up the bills he was just signing them. tos
No question TOS, had the Republicans not been elected to power in the early part of Clinton's administration, spending would have skyrocketed ultimately sending the economy into a recession of monumental proprotions. NG
8 comments:
It scares me to no end NG. I guess the stock market only counts when there's a Bill Clinton in the White House. But now it's all about minimum wage. They want someone who stocks Shelves at Walmart to be able to own a home and support a family of five.If I remember correctly when I worked at MacDonald's when I was 14 I don't recall being able to even support myself.
tos
Get ready to sell your stock if the Dems get elected...and keep your hand on your wallet. NG
Right. Bill Clinton comes into office, Dow at 4000. Bill Clinton leaves office, Dow at 11,000.
Bush comes into office, Dow at 11000. Six years later, Dow at 12000.
Yeah, you're right. We need more Republican leadership for the stock market.
Maybe in another 36 years of Republican leadership, the Dow can match its performance under Clinton.
Putz.
Dear Putz,
You think Clinton is running? That's rich....LOL!!!
I bet you haven't got the guts to put your money where you mouth is. If the Democrats win, put all your money in the economy. If you are so right, you'll make a mint. Right?
By the way, please stay on point. remember, Clinton isn't running, think Pelosi and Reid.
NG
The table tells the story. Since 1948, Republican Administrations have controlled the White House 57.2 percent of the time. But during the period that the GOP was in office, stock returns have averaged only 9.53 percent per year, while under Democratic administrations, stocks returned 15.25 percent per year, more than five percentage points higher.
http://finance.yahoo.com/columnist/article/futureinvest/3022
You're not only a putz. But you're an ignoramous.
Please try to learn something about life, the world and history before just pulling dumbass opinions out of yer ass.
And, no, Clinton isn't running. But I bet you hated him, too. Stock market be damned!
Putz.
You're the one who signed your comment “Putz.” You are absolutely right, you and the Democrats could care less about the stock market. Problem is, 60 per cent of Americans own stocks, so please, keep spouting that attitude. It’s such an intelligent concept...but typical of Democrats.
By the way, keep your foul keyboard on your own blog. Argue all you want, Mr. Putz, but keep your cussing to yourself. Your obvious hate is reminiscent of Moveon.org Democrats. But you're still unwilling to put your money where your mouth is.
You friend Jeremy Siegel called Clinton’s economy one of the “...greatest bubbles in history” and you know what fills bubbles. It was the largest single value loss in the history of the stock market other than the Depression. That was the real Clinton economy.
But despite what your claim, Clinton’s biggest challenge were thong panties. He had it easy because he did nothing about six terrorist attacks on America and turned over a recession and terrorists mess to Bush. Republicans have always had to clean up messes left by Democrats.
NG
Anon obviously doesn't know who was responsible for the economy under Clinton. Let's give a hint. It wasn't a democrat congress and it wasn't Bill Clinton making up the bills he was just signing them.
tos
No question TOS, had the Republicans not been elected to power in the early part of Clinton's administration, spending would have skyrocketed ultimately sending the economy into a recession of monumental proprotions. NG
Post a Comment