They’re about to reap the rewards of all their efforts promoting their “I hate Bush,” blame America first agenda. Remind me to be somewhere in Alaska when they make their breakthrough.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Friday, February 24, 2006
"Bring It On" TYPES ABOUT TO MAKE A BREAKTHROUGH
The wild-eyed “Bring It On” types have escaped the asylum and are digging their way out with the expectation of escape from the restrictive confines of the old Democrat party.
They’re about to reap the rewards of all their efforts promoting their “I hate Bush,” blame America first agenda. Remind me to be somewhere in Alaska when they make their breakthrough.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
They’re about to reap the rewards of all their efforts promoting their “I hate Bush,” blame America first agenda. Remind me to be somewhere in Alaska when they make their breakthrough.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Thursday, February 23, 2006
OUR GOVERNMENT IS IN GOOD HANDS?
Here is Senator Ted Kennedy working hard for the "little people" steering his yacht near Martha's Vineyard and away from those terrible wind farms that are being proposed to generate alternative power....as long as it's not in his back yard.
Senator Ted Kennedy
Mary Jo Kopechne was unavailable for comment
NG
Senator Ted Kennedy
Mary Jo Kopechne was unavailable for comment
NG
Tuesday, February 21, 2006
CRANKY MEETS HILLARY
Cranky Liberal was all excited to meet Hillary Clinton at a party one time. After he opened his typically foul mouth to introduce himself to Hillary, with her usually distain she looked down her nose at him and said, "If I were married to you, I'd put poison in your drink!!"
Without missing a beat, Cranky looked at the well-worn politician and said, "if I were your husband, I would drink it."
Sounds like a good idea to me.
Go get-em Cranky. Hillary awaits
NG
Without missing a beat, Cranky looked at the well-worn politician and said, "if I were your husband, I would drink it."
Sounds like a good idea to me.
Go get-em Cranky. Hillary awaits
NG
Saturday, February 18, 2006
WORLD'S BIGGEST POLLUTERS
Who has contributed most to increasing green house gases?
Answer: “ENVIRONMENTALISTS.”
Reason: Because they’re attempting to dictate political policies based on their intractable concept of political correctness rather
than rational study.
Example: One of the cleanest sources of energy is NUCLEAR. If the PC enviros hadn’t ended expansion of Nuclear energy, the amount of “greenhouse gases they so deplore would have been reduced for more than 25 years.
We would be less dependant on just fossil fuels. Inevitable progress is nuclear power would have been improving the power source, but environmentalists made it so expensive in court, it brought the advancement of nuclear energy to a screeching halt.
Today, we would be less dependant on foreign oil.
# The Vallecitos Nuclear Power Plant near Pleasanton, Calif., was jointly built by PG&E and General Electric Company and operated from 1957 to 1967. This was a small, 30 megawatt power plant. On October 19, 1957, Vallecitos connected to the electrical grid and became the first privately funded plant to supply power in megawatt amounts to the electric utility grid. The plant was shut down in December 1967. The plant is in SAFSTOR and there are no plans for any significant dismantlement in the foreseeable future. All nuclear fuel has been removed from the site.
# The 63 MW Boiling Water Reactor at the Humboldt Bay Nuclear Power Plant in Eureka was in operation by PG&E from August 1963 to July 1976. It was the seventh licensed nuclear plant in the United States. It was closed because the economics of a required seismic retrofit could not be justified following a moderate earthquake from a previously unknown fault just off the coast. It was permanently shut down July 2, 1976, and retired in 1985. The plant was then placed in SAFSTOR (with spent nuclear fuel rods stored in water pools on site) until anticipated full decommissioning in 2015. See more on SAFSTOR below.
# The 913 MW Pressurized Water Reactor at the Rancho Seco Nuclear Power Plant, located about 25 miles south of Sacramento, is owned by the Sacramento Municipal Utility District in [sic] and was [sic] operation from April 1975 to June 7, 1989. It was closed by public referendum.
# The 436 MW San Onofre Unit 1 Pressurized Water Reactor was in operation from January 1968 to November 30, 1992. It was closed by its owners rather than incur $125 million in required modifications.
FALSE SOLUTION: Now Arnold Schwarzenegger has decided to raise gas prices to reduce fossil fuel use. Once again, environmentalist’s inability to think clearly and into the future has made the alleged “man-caused” problem worse.
Thank you, environmentalists, your policies have created more “hot air” than cars ever did.
NG
Answer: “ENVIRONMENTALISTS.”
Reason: Because they’re attempting to dictate political policies based on their intractable concept of political correctness rather
than rational study.
Example: One of the cleanest sources of energy is NUCLEAR. If the PC enviros hadn’t ended expansion of Nuclear energy, the amount of “greenhouse gases they so deplore would have been reduced for more than 25 years.
We would be less dependant on just fossil fuels. Inevitable progress is nuclear power would have been improving the power source, but environmentalists made it so expensive in court, it brought the advancement of nuclear energy to a screeching halt.
Today, we would be less dependant on foreign oil.
# The Vallecitos Nuclear Power Plant near Pleasanton, Calif., was jointly built by PG&E and General Electric Company and operated from 1957 to 1967. This was a small, 30 megawatt power plant. On October 19, 1957, Vallecitos connected to the electrical grid and became the first privately funded plant to supply power in megawatt amounts to the electric utility grid. The plant was shut down in December 1967. The plant is in SAFSTOR and there are no plans for any significant dismantlement in the foreseeable future. All nuclear fuel has been removed from the site.
# The 63 MW Boiling Water Reactor at the Humboldt Bay Nuclear Power Plant in Eureka was in operation by PG&E from August 1963 to July 1976. It was the seventh licensed nuclear plant in the United States. It was closed because the economics of a required seismic retrofit could not be justified following a moderate earthquake from a previously unknown fault just off the coast. It was permanently shut down July 2, 1976, and retired in 1985. The plant was then placed in SAFSTOR (with spent nuclear fuel rods stored in water pools on site) until anticipated full decommissioning in 2015. See more on SAFSTOR below.
# The 913 MW Pressurized Water Reactor at the Rancho Seco Nuclear Power Plant, located about 25 miles south of Sacramento, is owned by the Sacramento Municipal Utility District in [sic] and was [sic] operation from April 1975 to June 7, 1989. It was closed by public referendum.
# The 436 MW San Onofre Unit 1 Pressurized Water Reactor was in operation from January 1968 to November 30, 1992. It was closed by its owners rather than incur $125 million in required modifications.
FALSE SOLUTION: Now Arnold Schwarzenegger has decided to raise gas prices to reduce fossil fuel use. Once again, environmentalist’s inability to think clearly and into the future has made the alleged “man-caused” problem worse.
Thank you, environmentalists, your policies have created more “hot air” than cars ever did.
NG
Tuesday, February 14, 2006
U of W STUDENT JILL EDWARDS IS AN UNGRATEFUL IDIOT
"The University of Washington's student senate rejected a memorial for alumnus Gregory "Pappy" Boyington of "Black Sheep Squadron" fame amid concerns a military hero who shot down enemy planes was not the right kind of person to represent the school."
Student senator Jill Edwards, according to minutes of the student government's meeting last week, said she "didn't believe a member of the Marine Corps was an example of the sort of person UW wanted to produce."
WorldNetDaily 2-14-06
How sad that what is supposed to be a “great” university is in reality a politically correct hack factory.
Your hateful student senate members who voted to label Pappy Boyington as an example of everything bad at your so-called university owe their very freedom to be stupid, to men like him.
What are your university professors teaching, that terrorism, Nazism or communism is good? This vote sure represents the retardation of these ungrateful overly pampered university children. Are they too stupid to even understand the history of the viciousness he suffered at the hands of the Japanese for their self-indulgent self-righteous idiocy?
Those students who voted to make this decision are NOT worthy to kiss the dirt on the bottom of Boyington shoes, much less make judgements about his service to this country and the freedom he provided.
What a PIG of a University with students to match. If the Alumni of the University of Washington don’t withdraw all financial support and donations to the university, they too join the intellectually-challenged members in the pathetic student senate.
Student senator Jill Edwards, according to minutes of the student government's meeting last week, said she "didn't believe a member of the Marine Corps was an example of the sort of person UW wanted to produce."
WorldNetDaily 2-14-06
How sad that what is supposed to be a “great” university is in reality a politically correct hack factory.
Your hateful student senate members who voted to label Pappy Boyington as an example of everything bad at your so-called university owe their very freedom to be stupid, to men like him.
What are your university professors teaching, that terrorism, Nazism or communism is good? This vote sure represents the retardation of these ungrateful overly pampered university children. Are they too stupid to even understand the history of the viciousness he suffered at the hands of the Japanese for their self-indulgent self-righteous idiocy?
Those students who voted to make this decision are NOT worthy to kiss the dirt on the bottom of Boyington shoes, much less make judgements about his service to this country and the freedom he provided.
What a PIG of a University with students to match. If the Alumni of the University of Washington don’t withdraw all financial support and donations to the university, they too join the intellectually-challenged members in the pathetic student senate.
Sunday, February 12, 2006
PLEASE NO MORE DEEP SOUTH DEMOCRAT PRESIDENTS
The Times Online is running a story about how Virginia Governor Mark Warner is “sneaking” up on Hillary Clinton in the Democrat Presidential nomination race. Why? Because Meg Hirschberg whose husband runs an organic yoghurt company in New Hampshire says: “I just want somebody with decent values who can win. It’s nothing to do with Hillary personally. It’s irrational and unfair, but she is polarising.” (British spellings)
My question is different, Meg is right. Hillary is a loser. But do we really want another deep-south Democrat Governor? Just consider the last two we've had.....Jimmy Carter, who was and is a walking disaster and Bill Clinton who created Osama bin Laden. Carter's presidency was a miserable failure and he is an even a worse ex-president. Somebody ought to hand him back his hammer and tell him to keep it mouth shut. His comments at the Corretta Scott King funeral were hopelessly out of place. Her funeral was to celebrate her life, not for him to give his petty pot shots.
Then there was Bill Clinton a convicted liar, who had the Bubble Presidency. It was pretty and shiny outside, but full of nothing but air. His "so-called" economy was a bubble, his fangless response to terrorists led to 911, gutting of the military made it more difficult for us to respond, promoting oral sex as not sex has created an epidemic in schools, not to mention harassing women with almost nothing to show for his presidency but a blue dress and an angry, bitter wife.
Perhaps the Democrats should look to the mid-west or far west for someone who starts off without the deep-south millstone around their neck.
My question is different, Meg is right. Hillary is a loser. But do we really want another deep-south Democrat Governor? Just consider the last two we've had.....Jimmy Carter, who was and is a walking disaster and Bill Clinton who created Osama bin Laden. Carter's presidency was a miserable failure and he is an even a worse ex-president. Somebody ought to hand him back his hammer and tell him to keep it mouth shut. His comments at the Corretta Scott King funeral were hopelessly out of place. Her funeral was to celebrate her life, not for him to give his petty pot shots.
Then there was Bill Clinton a convicted liar, who had the Bubble Presidency. It was pretty and shiny outside, but full of nothing but air. His "so-called" economy was a bubble, his fangless response to terrorists led to 911, gutting of the military made it more difficult for us to respond, promoting oral sex as not sex has created an epidemic in schools, not to mention harassing women with almost nothing to show for his presidency but a blue dress and an angry, bitter wife.
Perhaps the Democrats should look to the mid-west or far west for someone who starts off without the deep-south millstone around their neck.
Wednesday, February 08, 2006
THE UGLY SMELL OF CENSORSHIP ON THE LEFT
The ugly smell of censorship has made its presence known. Muslims have demanded that cartoon drawings of Mohammad not be published in any form and many have died in their efforts to censor all who would dare to publish them.
Ironically, a fresco of Mohammad was sculpted on the facade of the US Supreme Court building as one of the world’s great law givers...and we haven’t heard one peep out of the wild-eyed Muslims over that and it’s been there since October 1932. Mohammad is even holding a sword.
To my great surprise, the French satirical weekly “Charlie Hebdo” published a cover cartoon of its own of Mohammad with his face in his hands and the comment “It’s hard to be loved by fools” along with all 12 cartoons that were first printed in Denmark’s Jyllands-Posten.
A french Court rejected efforts by Muslim organizations to prevent their publication but were rejected by a French court. Maybe there is some value in French arrogance after all.
“Charlie Hebdo” editor Philippe Val wrote in the accompanying editorial: "When extremists extract concessions from democracies on points of principle, either by blackmail or terror, democracies do not have long left." Well said!
Such is the case with the extreme leftist Blog “Bring It On” which has censored me off their blog because they didn’t “like my personality.” They’re just like the censoring Muslims. But they don’t consider their censorship, censorship because they don’t like me, which makes it OK. It’s the very definition of censorship hypocrisy.
The truth is “Bring It On's” Cranky Liberal, Dr. Forbush, The Basturd, Pia Savage, Muligan, Christ in Idaho, Jet, Tom Harper, MoxieGrrrl, Jersey McJones, JoeSnitty and Bob Geiger are censoring cowards.
(tip of the hat to: Reuters for the “Charlie Hebdo” story)
Ironically, a fresco of Mohammad was sculpted on the facade of the US Supreme Court building as one of the world’s great law givers...and we haven’t heard one peep out of the wild-eyed Muslims over that and it’s been there since October 1932. Mohammad is even holding a sword.
To my great surprise, the French satirical weekly “Charlie Hebdo” published a cover cartoon of its own of Mohammad with his face in his hands and the comment “It’s hard to be loved by fools” along with all 12 cartoons that were first printed in Denmark’s Jyllands-Posten.
A french Court rejected efforts by Muslim organizations to prevent their publication but were rejected by a French court. Maybe there is some value in French arrogance after all.
“Charlie Hebdo” editor Philippe Val wrote in the accompanying editorial: "When extremists extract concessions from democracies on points of principle, either by blackmail or terror, democracies do not have long left." Well said!
Such is the case with the extreme leftist Blog “Bring It On” which has censored me off their blog because they didn’t “like my personality.” They’re just like the censoring Muslims. But they don’t consider their censorship, censorship because they don’t like me, which makes it OK. It’s the very definition of censorship hypocrisy.
The truth is “Bring It On's” Cranky Liberal, Dr. Forbush, The Basturd, Pia Savage, Muligan, Christ in Idaho, Jet, Tom Harper, MoxieGrrrl, Jersey McJones, JoeSnitty and Bob Geiger are censoring cowards.
(tip of the hat to: Reuters for the “Charlie Hebdo” story)
Sunday, February 05, 2006
A HISTORY LESSON
Students were assigned to read 2 books, "Titanic" & "My
Life" by Bill Clinton. One smart a** student turned in the following
book report, with the proposition that they were nearly identical
stories! His cool professor gave him an A+ for this report:
Titanic: $29.99
Clinton: $29.99
Titanic: Over 3 hours to read
Clinton: Over 3 hours to read
Titanic: The story of Jack and Rose, their forbidden love, and subsequent catastrophe.
Clinton: The story of Bill and Monica, their forbidden love, and subsequent catastrophe.
Titanic: Jack is a starving artist.
Clinton: Bill is a BS artist.
Titanic: In one scene, Jack enjoys a good cigar.
Clinton: Ditto for Bill.
Titanic: During ordeal, Rose's dress gets ruined.
Clinton: Ditto for Monica.
Titanic: Jack teaches Rose to spit.
Clinton: Let's not go there.
Titanic: Rose gets to keep her jewelry.
Clinton: Monica's forced to return her gifts.
Titanic: Rose remembers Jack for the rest of her life.
Clinton: Clinton doesn't remember Jack.
Titanic: Rose goes down on a vessel full of seamen.
Clinton: Monica...ooh, let's not go there, either.
Titanic: Jack surrenders to an icy death.
Clinton: Bill goes home to Hilary...basically the same thing.
This was sent to me via a friend. Not sure of the author, but he/she should be recognized for some very creative thinking. "My immediate response was it's so true." NG
Life" by Bill Clinton. One smart a** student turned in the following
book report, with the proposition that they were nearly identical
stories! His cool professor gave him an A+ for this report:
Titanic: $29.99
Clinton: $29.99
Titanic: Over 3 hours to read
Clinton: Over 3 hours to read
Titanic: The story of Jack and Rose, their forbidden love, and subsequent catastrophe.
Clinton: The story of Bill and Monica, their forbidden love, and subsequent catastrophe.
Titanic: Jack is a starving artist.
Clinton: Bill is a BS artist.
Titanic: In one scene, Jack enjoys a good cigar.
Clinton: Ditto for Bill.
Titanic: During ordeal, Rose's dress gets ruined.
Clinton: Ditto for Monica.
Titanic: Jack teaches Rose to spit.
Clinton: Let's not go there.
Titanic: Rose gets to keep her jewelry.
Clinton: Monica's forced to return her gifts.
Titanic: Rose remembers Jack for the rest of her life.
Clinton: Clinton doesn't remember Jack.
Titanic: Rose goes down on a vessel full of seamen.
Clinton: Monica...ooh, let's not go there, either.
Titanic: Jack surrenders to an icy death.
Clinton: Bill goes home to Hilary...basically the same thing.
This was sent to me via a friend. Not sure of the author, but he/she should be recognized for some very creative thinking. "My immediate response was it's so true." NG
Friday, February 03, 2006
IT'S TIME TO TAKE CONTROL OF OUR BORDERS
Subject: Illegal Immigrants into Mexico
Try doing to Mexico what illegal hispanic immigrants are doing to America.
*Enter Mexico illegally. Never mind immigration quotas, visas, international law.
*Once there, demand local government provide free medical care for you and your entire family.
*Demand bilingual nurses and doctors.
*Demand free bilingual local government forms, bulletins, etc.
*Procreate abundantly.
*Demand "anchor" baby connections.
*Deflect any criticism of this allegedly irresponsible reproductive behavior with, "It is a cultural U.S.A. thing. You would not understand, pal."
*Keep your American identity strong. Fly Old Glory from your rooftop, or proudly display it in your front window or on your car bumper.
*Speak only English at home and in public and insist that your children do likewise.
*Demand classes on American culture in the Mexican school system.
*Demand state resident status for state college entrance, including financial assistance for which you paid no taxes.
*Demand a local Mexican driver license. This will afford you other legal rights and will go far to legitimize your unauthorized, illegal, presence in Mexico.
*Drive around with no liability insurance and ignore local traffic laws.
*Insist that local Mexican law enforcement teach English to all its officers.
*Good luck! You'll be demanding for the rest of time or soon be dead,
because it will never happen. It will not happen in Mexico or any other country in the world except right here in the United States.
Will all of American eventually be turned into “East Los Angeles” a gang infested land of murder and hate, I grew up there I know what went on then and it's worse now. The "Hispanic Nations Problems" should not be America's problem.
*What does Mexico do with illegal immigrants on their southern border....Shoot ‘em. And President Vicente Fox cries “America does not have the right to build a fence to protect our borders.”
American is being invaded and we do almost nothing. WHY?
Try doing to Mexico what illegal hispanic immigrants are doing to America.
*Enter Mexico illegally. Never mind immigration quotas, visas, international law.
*Once there, demand local government provide free medical care for you and your entire family.
*Demand bilingual nurses and doctors.
*Demand free bilingual local government forms, bulletins, etc.
*Procreate abundantly.
*Demand "anchor" baby connections.
*Deflect any criticism of this allegedly irresponsible reproductive behavior with, "It is a cultural U.S.A. thing. You would not understand, pal."
*Keep your American identity strong. Fly Old Glory from your rooftop, or proudly display it in your front window or on your car bumper.
*Speak only English at home and in public and insist that your children do likewise.
*Demand classes on American culture in the Mexican school system.
*Demand state resident status for state college entrance, including financial assistance for which you paid no taxes.
*Demand a local Mexican driver license. This will afford you other legal rights and will go far to legitimize your unauthorized, illegal, presence in Mexico.
*Drive around with no liability insurance and ignore local traffic laws.
*Insist that local Mexican law enforcement teach English to all its officers.
*Good luck! You'll be demanding for the rest of time or soon be dead,
because it will never happen. It will not happen in Mexico or any other country in the world except right here in the United States.
Will all of American eventually be turned into “East Los Angeles” a gang infested land of murder and hate, I grew up there I know what went on then and it's worse now. The "Hispanic Nations Problems" should not be America's problem.
*What does Mexico do with illegal immigrants on their southern border....Shoot ‘em. And President Vicente Fox cries “America does not have the right to build a fence to protect our borders.”
American is being invaded and we do almost nothing. WHY?
Thursday, February 02, 2006
LIBERAL BLOGS CRY CENSORSHIP...OH REALLY!
Isn’t it interesting that CrankyLiberal has censored me off his blog and Cranky personally led the effort to censor me off another liberal blog called: Bring It On. As a sarcastic conservative, they didn’t like me. So liberals censored the conservative.
Now, liberals are going ballistic over a letter signed by all six Joint chiefs of staff critical of Washington Post cartoonist Tom Toles. His political cartoon was a totally tasteless political cartoon depicting a quadruple amputee soldier in a hospital bed, with a “Dr. Rumsfeld” saying “I’m listing your condition as ‘battle hardened.’”
Ultra-liberal John Aravosis from AMERICAblog.com is screaming “censorship.” His crybaby headline reads “Pentagon trying to censor top US political cartoonist.” The Joint Chiefs didn’t censor Toles, but criticized him for his profound lack of decency.
Meanwhile, Cranky and Bring It On have no compunction about censoring sarcastic conservative comments from me on their blogs. Such is the hypocritical world of the hate-screaming fiberal left.
Also interesting is that fiberals are afraid of Islamists and will censor whatever the Muslim radicals don’t like. Proving once again that Fibs both censor and are cowards.
Now, liberals are going ballistic over a letter signed by all six Joint chiefs of staff critical of Washington Post cartoonist Tom Toles. His political cartoon was a totally tasteless political cartoon depicting a quadruple amputee soldier in a hospital bed, with a “Dr. Rumsfeld” saying “I’m listing your condition as ‘battle hardened.’”
Ultra-liberal John Aravosis from AMERICAblog.com is screaming “censorship.” His crybaby headline reads “Pentagon trying to censor top US political cartoonist.” The Joint Chiefs didn’t censor Toles, but criticized him for his profound lack of decency.
Meanwhile, Cranky and Bring It On have no compunction about censoring sarcastic conservative comments from me on their blogs. Such is the hypocritical world of the hate-screaming fiberal left.
Also interesting is that fiberals are afraid of Islamists and will censor whatever the Muslim radicals don’t like. Proving once again that Fibs both censor and are cowards.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)