Friday, September 19, 2008

SHOULD SANDRA BERNHARD BE RAPED BY RADICAL MUSLIMS?

Sandra Bernhard says that Sarah Palin should be raped by big black men. That is a patently racist threat because it assumes that being raped by a black man is worse than being raped by a white man. It's always interesting when a wild-eyed liberal reveals their racism so blatantly. Thankfully Bernhard doesn't face the prospect of rape...one look at that face and you'd immediately have a severe case of erectile dysfunction.

6 comments:

USpace said...

.
Sandra Bernhard's biggest attraction was always just an ugly woman trying to be funny. These Leftist women are really losing their minds. Rosanne wondered on Bill Maher's show whether McCain would take away women's right to vote. Even Maher's audience thought that was a nutso thing to think.
.
absurd thought -
God of the Universe says
never elect a woman

who's a conservative
she's just a gender traitor

.
absurd thought -
God of the Universe says
just HOPE to pay more taxes

DREAM about high fuel prices
CHANGE PROGRESS to move backwards

.
absurd thought -
God of the Universe says
NEVER ELECT a woman

OR a minority
if they are Right of center

.
All real freedom starts with freedom of speech. Without freedom of speech there can be no real freedom.
.
Philosophy of Liberty Cartoon
.
Help Halt Terrorism Today!
.
USpace

:)
.

NewGnome said...

Well you have some free speech here...It is amazing what we on the right are not allowed to do...think for yourselves, criticize Obama or Michelle, actually demand accountability, judge government programs in terms of success or failure and eliminate the failures or actually praise America, the greatest country God ever created!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NG

Anonymous said...

That woman is a freak beyond nature. Amazing to see how Obama has all these freaks as followers.
Losers.
tos

NewGnome said...

I really wonder about the intelligence of a woman who is Jewish, who supports a Democrat Candidate who is willing to give credence to Ahmedinejad who says we will wipe Israel off the map. It just makes no sense. NG

Anonymous said...

NG-

If you get a chance, I have a prompt for a post for you. I honestly am somewhat undecided about the election (as if it matters for the presidential race since I'm still a registered voter in Oklahoma - although local elections are much closer and I will be voting primarily with those in mind), but as you well know, I'm on the left, although not Obama left. One of the unresolved questions I have about McCain is how he proposes to lower taxes even further (I saw some numbers on NBC news with Brian Williams tonight, they weren't total numbers but they compared the two candidates for each income groups, and even if their numbers were incorrect I believe that it's safe to say that McCain does want to lower taxes), in light of the nearly 1 Trillion dollars the Bush administration is using to back up Wall Street (and I'm not condemning this out of hand. I don't know enough about this type aspect of economics to say whether or not the bailout is a good thing - going to a law and business professor forum on wednesday where they're going to talk about the reasons behind it and whether they think it will work or was the right/wrong thing to do).

Of course I ramble. But I'd like your take, in some detail, i.e. not just irate rhetoric, as to whether McCain can really lower taxes and balance the budget? I would have given the continued wars in the middle east higher billing in this, but although my news coverage has been limited lately, I do think I'm correct in saying that Bush has at the very least put forth withdrawal plans, so I wouldn't consider that as big of a financial drain as possible.

If you don't feel like taking the time to make a post for this, my e-mail address is rschaller1@luc.edu. So at your convenience feel free to e-mail me about this. And I really am curious. I have a lot of issues with Sarah Palin, but I don't mind McCain as much as I would have some one like Mike Huckabee, so I really am interested in this, because I can't find a news story willing to explain it to me. Alternatively if you know of a news source that as already covered this topic, the link would suffice. No e-mail is necessary if you decide to tackle the issue on your blog.

I do ask that you use your editorial powers to delete my e-mail address when you publish this comment. It's very new and I really do not want it to be floating around for anyone to find.

Lonely, the former Blogger.

NewGnome said...

Lonely, Sorry I haven't responded as before. My wife had a lump in her neck (fortunately it's benign)and at the same time two of our children have had babies. And I've been in the hospital. Haven't had the time to address you properly. Give me a day or so and I'll get back. Just a quick answer. The creation of capital is the only way to really create jobs, increase income and pay for individual needs. If you want to destroy something, tax it. That is the basic playbook of the Democrats...tax, tax, tax. Raising taxes has the opposite affect. If you are a small businessman, who, creates 60 per cent of the jobs in America, would be hurt severely by Obama's policies and taxes increases...which ultimately will impact jobs and income. He simply doesn't have the experience in the world of private enterprise. The questions then becomes do we want socialism or not. I am one who does not. Since Johnson's war on Poverty we have spent more than 7 trillion dollars on " the war onpoverty." And it hasn't be solved. Changing a person's reliance on government is the only solution to poverty. (sorry about the email address, didn't realize it was there before I published. Your comments come in on my email and since I don't worry about the content of your emails I publish immediately. If I can figure out how, I'll delete it. I'm not much of a computer expert but I can get help.) This has been an extremely wild last several weeks.
NG