So, Tom Delay R-Texas chooses not to run again. He said his re-election campaign would be a “nasty” fight and chose to avoid it. Delay was a bare-knuckle political fighter ready to duke it out with Democrats on any issue. But it was in the political arena, he wasn’t physically violent, but he certainly was politically tough.
On the other side of the aisle, Rep. Cynthia McKinney D-Georgia is physically violent against WHITE police officers and used taxpayer money illegally. She faces an FEC investigation for the money problem and potential assault charges for punching out a U.S. Capitol Police officer for failing to recognize her with her new “Buckwheat” inspired do. If you think this is a racist remark, please get a picture of Buckwheat and compare for yourself. If not Buckwheat, try the Office Max spokesman.
She refused to wear her congressional pin identifying herself as other congressmen and women do. Then, she reaches into the garbage can to get Danny Glover and Harry Belafonte to support her. Are there two more pathetic Hollywood types in all of America. Glover promotes violence in "Lethal Weapon." Belafonte is simply certifiably cracked.
So with Republicans you get tough political bouts, and with Democrats you get smash-mouth actual physical violence. It’s Democrats who prefer personal, violent, physical confrontation while calling themselves the party of peace...YEA RIGHT! What do you want AMERICA, tough politicians or physically violent ones? With Cynthia you get a knuckle sandwich.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
THAT ARTCLE WAS A LITTLE OVER THE TOP, EVEN FOR YOU.
ARMY BRAT VA
All I can say imagine if this was a republican that did this. I can imagine the media coverage and backlash it would be getting from the party of "hate"
TOS
Dear Army Brat, what exactly was over the top even for me? That a black women is a racist or that she used taxpayer money illegally.
Or that physical violence is acceptable?
NG
Had a Republican done what McKinney did, they'd have been hung by their thumbs and beaten with a scourge. NG
You actually expect an answer to that comment from Army Brat? Good luck.
TOS
TOS, I very much enjoy your comments and appreciate your consistant postings and you're sure welcome to disagree at your discretion. But my feeling is just like the situation on "Bring It On." I welcome "Army Brat's" opinions. I hope AB will answer. It's very intellectually stimulating to defend one's posts.
BIO on the other hand, claims to be ready to debate, that is unless you make a better argument or are sarcastic. If I give my opinion and someone disagrees even sarcastically, I respond if I feel like it, but at least I don't censor like BIO. Although if someone uses profanity I will censor that. I don't like profanity because it reduces vocabulary and the ability to clearly state your opinion.
I really think that my sarcasim was what got Cranky and Dr. "Not" Forbush so riled up. I didn't cuss and my arguments were cogent and sound but I was VERY sarcastic at their frequently ridiculous expense and they didn't like that. Rather than argue, they chose to censor...a coward's way out. So the Army Brat can say whatever he/she wants.
However, I do reserve the right to censor anyone who says anything that is fattening. NG
The thing is I'm not here to make your head swell,I really do agree with what you have to say. I always enjoyed your comments on BIO because you really left them speechless(commentless) at times.
But thanx for the opportunity to disagree.
TOS
I don't think your making my head swell, we just agreee on most things. My problems is that I have a case of Dunlaps Disease...and it ain't pretty.
NG
Post a Comment