More and more
scientists are beginning to leave the sinking ship called "Climate
Change." Recently, two major
scientists have very noisily fallen off the climate change momentum wagon. Professor Woodcock is Emeritus Professor of
Chemical Thermodynamics at the University of Manchester, in an interview with
the Yorkshire Evening Post and reported in Nick Hallett's Breitbart column
April 26, 2014, called the term climate change meaningless since essentially
there has never been a time on earth that the climate has not been
changing.
He concurrently
claimed that "There is no
reproducible scientific evidence CO2 has significantly increased in the last
100 years."
The scientific
method of proving a hypothesis is that you produce a replicable test
verifying the hypothesis which other
scientists can then confirm by reproducing the test with the same results. Scientific computer models have been proven
wrong so often that they're meaningless at this point. Garbage in, garbage out, as they say. None of the computer models that scientists
swear by, have predicted the current state of stasis in the temperature since
1998. Thus there is a serious problem
with the predictive models.
Meanwhile, James
Lovelock, once touted as a "green guru" has rejected the so-called
consensus science promoted by the ICPP and it's most recent report as too
politicized to be of scientific value.
But his claim
"that climate scientists "just guess", and that no one really
knows what's happening," is priceless.
Faulty computer
models, climate scientists non-replicable theories, claims that specific weather events are
directly attributable to anthropomorphic climate change or warming, really put
climate scientists pushing they're propaganda into a succinct couple of
words: Climate Guessers.
Also from Hallett's
column: Judith Curry, chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at
the Georgia Institute of Technology, also said that she was "duped into
supporting the IPCC" and added "If the IPCC is dogma, then count me in
as a heretic."
